Table 9 Sensitivity analysis of the cost effective emission reduction and water savings
Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy benefits | CO2 reductions (Mt) | 100 | 124 | 90 | 100 | 110 |
SO2 reductions (kt) | 214 | 266 | 193 | 214 | 235 | |
NO x reductions (kt) | 184 | 206 | 175 | 184 | 192 | |
PM10 reductions (kt) | 109 | 147 | 93 | 109 | 124 | |
Water savings (million m3) | 1555 | 1587 | 1548 | 1555 | 1562 | |
Energy benefits + emission reduction benefits | CO2 reductions (Mt) | 124 | 129 | 104 | 100 | 129 |
SO2 reductions (kt) | 265 | 277 | 223 | 214 | 277 | |
NO x reductions (kt) | 204 | 215 | 187 | 184 | 215 | |
PM10 reductions (kt) | 147 | 153 | 115 | 109 | 153 | |
Water savings (million m3) | 1,572 | 1662 | 1558 | 1555 | 1662 | |
Energy benefits + environmental benefits | CO2 reductions (Mt) | 127 | 129 | 104 | 100 | 130 |
SO2 reductions (kt) | 272 | 277 | 223 | 214 | 278 | |
NO x reductions (kt) | 213 | 215 | 187 | 184 | 216 | |
PM10 reductions (kt) | 149 | 153 | 115 | 109 | 153 | |
Water savings (million m3) | 1,660 | 1662 | 1558 | 1555 | 1673 |