Skip to main content

Table 2 Response comparison among proposed models and conventional models under long-period and pulse-type ground motions

From: Innovative base-isolated building with large mass-ratio TMD at basement for greater earthquake resilience

 

Proposed-1-1 Model

Proposed-1-2 Model

Proposed-1-3 Model

Proposed-2 Model

Imass TMD Model

NewTMD Model

Long-period ground motion

 Deformation of base-isolation story

×

â–³

â—Ž

â–³

â—Ž

〇

 Top-floor absolute acceleration

×

â–³

â—Ž

â–³

â—Ž

•

 Deformation of superstructure

×

â–³

â—Ž

â–³

â—Ž

•

 TMD stroke

Similar reduction from Proposed-1 Model

 TMD displacement relative to ground

×

â—Ž

〇

〇

â—Ž

â—Ž

 Reaction of spring supporting TMD

×

â—Ž

×

â–³

×

â–³

 Reaction of oil damper supporting TMD

•

â–³

×

â–³

×

â–³

 Reaction of inertial mass damper supporting TMD

–

–

–

â—Ž

×

–

Pulse-type ground motion

 Deformation of base-isolation story

•

•

•

•

•

•

 Top-floor absolute acceleration

•

•

•

•

•

•

 Deformation of superstructure

•

•

•

•

•

•

 TMD stroke

â—Ž

〇

•

â—Ž

•

〇

 TMD displacement relative to ground

•

•

•

〇

â—Ž

〇

 Reaction of spring supporting TMD

â–³

â—Ž

×

•

â–³

â–³

 Reaction of oil damper supporting TMD

â–³

â–³

×

•

×

×

 Reaction of inertial mass damper supporting TMD

–

–

–

â—Ž

×

–

  1. ◎: excellent performance, 〇: good performance, △: fair performance, ×: ordinary performance
  2. •: small change from Proposed-1 model